Re: [PATCH v2] sh: Call paging_init() earlier in the init sequence
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <0e813c8498bf3d9ed5d8fd5b171ac9980dc2999c.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> |
Hello Oreoluwa, On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 14:42 -0700, Oreoluwa Babatunde wrote: > memblock_alloc() marks all its allocations as reserved by calling > memblock_reserve(). > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/mm/memblock.c#L1463 > > This should normally stop other users from allocating from within that > region of memory. > > But in this case, since all the free memory regions have already been > transferred over to the bootmem framework by paging_init(), I am not > sure if that logic will still hold for the unflatten_deivcetree allocated memory. > > The main goal of this patch is to make sure that the reserved memory > regions defined in the DT are set aside before any memblock allocations > are done (which includes the allocation done by unflatten_devicetree). > > Hence, I can restructure the patch to only remove the portion of code that is > is responsible for setting aside the DT defined reserved memory regions from > within paging_init(), and move it above the unflatten_devicetree() call. > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/sh/mm/init.c#L292 > > I will explore further and possibly restructure this patch based on my findings. OK, sounds like a plan. In the meantime, I have set up my J2 Turtle Board and I am actually now able to test patches for this target, so that I would be able to verify that your patch didn't break anything. However, I think for v6.10 I think the ship has sailed. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913