Re: [PATCH v2] sh: Call paging_init() earlier in the init sequence
Oreoluwa Babatunde <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/7/2024 3:41 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hello Oreoluwa, > > On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 14:42 -0700, Oreoluwa Babatunde wrote: >> memblock_alloc() marks all its allocations as reserved by calling >> memblock_reserve(). >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/mm/memblock.c#L1463 >> >> This should normally stop other users from allocating from within that >> region of memory. >> >> But in this case, since all the free memory regions have already been >> transferred over to the bootmem framework by paging_init(), I am not >> sure if that logic will still hold for the unflatten_deivcetree allocated memory. >> >> The main goal of this patch is to make sure that the reserved memory >> regions defined in the DT are set aside before any memblock allocations >> are done (which includes the allocation done by unflatten_devicetree). >> >> Hence, I can restructure the patch to only remove the portion of code that is >> is responsible for setting aside the DT defined reserved memory regions from >> within paging_init(), and move it above the unflatten_devicetree() call. >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/sh/mm/init.c#L292 >> >> I will explore further and possibly restructure this patch based on my findings. > OK, sounds like a plan. In the meantime, I have set up my J2 Turtle Board and > I am actually now able to test patches for this target, so that I would be > able to verify that your patch didn't break anything. > > However, I think for v6.10 I think the ship has sailed. > > Adrian Hi Adrian, I have uploaded v3 of this patch now. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ In this new version, paging_init() is left in its original position and only the portion of code that is responsible for setting aside the reserved memory regions is moved. Thank you! Oreoluwa