Re: [PATCH 07/15] parisc: use generic sys_fanotify_mark implementation

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:54:08 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.sparc,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.lib.musl.general,gmane.linux.ltp,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.alpha,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.ports.hexagon,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel
Message-ID	<3444b93ce46c7e7c156f912495e5c35ccf275549.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>

Hi,

On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 08:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> It's more likely to be related to the upward growing stack.
> I checked the gcc sources and found that out of the 50 supported
> architectures, ARGS_GROW_DOWNWARD is set on everything except
> for gcn, stormy16 and  32-bit parisc. The other two are
> little-endian though. STACK_GROWS_DOWNWARD in turn is set on
> everything other than parisc (both 32-bit and 64-bit).

Wait a second! Does that mean that on 64-bit PA-RISC, the stack is
actually growing downwards? If yes, that would be a strong argument
for creating a 64-bit PA-RISC port in Debian and replacing the 32-bit
port.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913