[PATCH v2 10/25] x86/numa: simplify numa_distance allocation
Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree,gmane.linux.acpi.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.documentation,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sparc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <[email protected]> Allocation of numa_distance uses memblock_phys_alloc_range() to limit allocation to be below the last mapped page. But NUMA initializaition runs after the direct map is populated and there is also code in setup_arch() that adjusts memblock limit to reflect how much memory is already mapped in the direct map. Simplify the allocation of numa_distance and use plain memblock_alloc(). Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]> --- arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index 5e1dde26674b..edfc38803779 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -331,7 +331,6 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void) nodemask_t nodes_parsed; size_t size; int i, j, cnt = 0; - u64 phys; /* size the new table and allocate it */ nodes_parsed = numa_nodes_parsed; @@ -342,16 +341,14 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void) cnt++; size = cnt * cnt * sizeof(numa_distance[0]); - phys = memblock_phys_alloc_range(size, PAGE_SIZE, 0, - PFN_PHYS(max_pfn_mapped)); - if (!phys) { + numa_distance = memblock_alloc(size, PAGE_SIZE); + if (!numa_distance) { pr_warn("Warning: can't allocate distance table!\n"); /* don't retry until explicitly reset */ numa_distance = (void *)1LU; return -ENOMEM; } - numa_distance = __va(phys); numa_distance_cnt = cnt; /* fill with the default distances */ -- 2.43.0