[PATCH v3 11/26] x86/numa: use get_pfn_range_for_nid to verify that node spans memory
Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree,gmane.linux.acpi.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.documentation,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sparc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <[email protected]> Instead of looping over numa_meminfo array to detect node's start and end addresses use get_pfn_range_for_init(). This is shorter and make it easier to lift numa_memblks to generic code. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]> Tested-by: Zi Yan <[email protected]> # for x86_64 and arm64 --- arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 13 +++---------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index edfc38803779..cfe7e5477cf8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -521,17 +521,10 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi) /* Finally register nodes. */ for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) { - u64 start = PFN_PHYS(max_pfn); - u64 end = 0; + unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn; - for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) { - if (nid != mi->blk[i].nid) - continue; - start = min(mi->blk[i].start, start); - end = max(mi->blk[i].end, end); - } - - if (start >= end) + get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn); + if (start_pfn >= end_pfn) continue; alloc_node_data(nid); -- 2.43.0