Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: Add optional close() to struct vm_special_mapping

Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.uml.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.hexagon,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel
Message-ID <CAHk-=wgsDJ+sA1T01YT-z5TXs3zxJ54f0VDApkZ1pgcr8T=myQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 12:51, Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Yes, that appears to fix it for me. I don't have much to say about the
> rest but others might :)

Ok, I did a quick hack-job to remove that disgusting
install_special_mapping() legacy case.

With this, the old "install_special_mapping()" mess no longer exists,
but I haven't even attempted to compile the result, because I don't
have cross-compile environments for any of the affected architectures.

Except UML. I did at least build it there, but it's not like I tested it.

Adding architecture maintainers and more architecture lists to the
participants. It would be good to actually get this patch tested.
Context for newly added people:

   https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wj9QPhG4CjiX8YLRC1wHj_Qs-T8wJi0WEhkfp0cszvB9w@mail.gmail.com/

NOTE! This patch is against my current tree, not the linux-next
changes. But it should entirely remove the case that caused problems
in linux-next.

                      Linus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.