[PATCH v2 -next 02/15] mm: filemap: move sysctl to its own file

Kaixiong Yu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.nfs,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.kernel.lsm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This moves the filemap related sysctl to its own file, and
removes the redundant external variable declaration.

Signed-off-by: Kaixiong Yu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/mm.h |  2 --
 kernel/sysctl.c    |  8 --------
 mm/filemap.c       | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index a7c74a840249..ca196ba1e2d8 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -39,8 +39,6 @@ struct user_struct;
 struct pt_regs;
 struct folio_batch;
 
-extern int sysctl_page_lock_unfairness;
-
 void mm_core_init(void);
 void init_mm_internals(void);
 
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index 726b866af57b..2a875b739054 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -2089,14 +2089,6 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
 		.extra1		= SYSCTL_ONE,
 		.extra2		= SYSCTL_FOUR,
 	},
-	{
-		.procname	= "page_lock_unfairness",
-		.data		= &sysctl_page_lock_unfairness,
-		.maxlen		= sizeof(sysctl_page_lock_unfairness),
-		.mode		= 0644,
-		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_minmax,
-		.extra1		= SYSCTL_ZERO,
-	},
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
 	{
 		.procname	= "max_map_count",
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 065d130c1c07..98e36e2b7290 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
 #include <linux/splice.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate_wait.h>
 #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
+#include <linux/sysctl.h>
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 #include "internal.h"
@@ -1069,6 +1070,19 @@ static wait_queue_head_t *folio_waitqueue(struct folio *folio)
 	return &folio_wait_table[hash_ptr(folio, PAGE_WAIT_TABLE_BITS)];
 }
 
+/* How many times do we accept lock stealing from under a waiter? */
+static int sysctl_page_lock_unfairness = 5;
+static struct ctl_table filemap_sysctl_table[] = {
+	{
+		.procname	= "page_lock_unfairness",
+		.data		= &sysctl_page_lock_unfairness,
+		.maxlen		= sizeof(sysctl_page_lock_unfairness),
+		.mode		= 0644,
+		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_minmax,
+		.extra1		= SYSCTL_ZERO,
+	}
+};
+
 void __init pagecache_init(void)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -1077,6 +1091,7 @@ void __init pagecache_init(void)
 		init_waitqueue_head(&folio_wait_table[i]);
 
 	page_writeback_init();
+	register_sysctl_init("vm", filemap_sysctl_table);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1224,9 +1239,6 @@ static inline bool folio_trylock_flag(struct folio *folio, int bit_nr,
 	return true;
 }
 
-/* How many times do we accept lock stealing from under a waiter? */
-int sysctl_page_lock_unfairness = 5;
-
 static inline int folio_wait_bit_common(struct folio *folio, int bit_nr,
 		int state, enum behavior behavior)
 {
-- 
2.25.1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.