Re: [PATCH v2 -next 00/15] sysctl: move sysctls from vm_table into its own files

yukaixiong <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel.lsm,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.nfs,gmane.linux.network
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 2024/9/4 4:38, Joel Granados wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:29:56AM +0800, Kaixiong Yu wrote:
>> This patch series moves sysctls of vm_table in kernel/sysctl.c to
>> places where they actually belong, and do some related code clean-ups.
>> After this patch series, all sysctls in vm_table have been moved into its
>> own files, meanwhile, delete vm_table.
>>
>> All the modifications of this patch series base on
>> linux-next(tags/next-20240902). To test this patch series, the code was
>> compiled with both the CONFIG_SYSCTL enabled and disabled on arm64 and
>> x86_64 architectures. After this patch series is applied, all files
>> under /proc/sys/vm can be read or written normally.
> This move make a lot of sense. The question with these multi-subsystem
> patchsets is how do they go into mainline. For now I have added this to
> sysctl-testing to see if it needs more work. I can push this through the
> sysctl subsystem, but you need to get reviewed-by for all of the commits
> in different subsystems. I'm also fine with this going in through some
> other subsys if anyone wants to take it?
>
> Best
>

Thx,Joel!:-)

Hello,everyone!

This patch series has been reviewed by Kees, Jan Kara, Christian 
Brauner, and acked
by Anna Schumaker, Paul Moore. As Joel said, this patch series need to 
get reviewed-by
for all of the commits in different subsystems. I would appreciate it if 
you could review
this patch series as soon as possible !:-)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.