Re: [PATCH v2 -next 00/15] sysctl: move sysctls from vm_table into its own files
yukaixiong <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.lsm,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.nfs,gmane.linux.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2024/9/4 4:38, Joel Granados wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 11:29:56AM +0800, Kaixiong Yu wrote: >> This patch series moves sysctls of vm_table in kernel/sysctl.c to >> places where they actually belong, and do some related code clean-ups. >> After this patch series, all sysctls in vm_table have been moved into its >> own files, meanwhile, delete vm_table. >> >> All the modifications of this patch series base on >> linux-next(tags/next-20240902). To test this patch series, the code was >> compiled with both the CONFIG_SYSCTL enabled and disabled on arm64 and >> x86_64 architectures. After this patch series is applied, all files >> under /proc/sys/vm can be read or written normally. > This move make a lot of sense. The question with these multi-subsystem > patchsets is how do they go into mainline. For now I have added this to > sysctl-testing to see if it needs more work. I can push this through the > sysctl subsystem, but you need to get reviewed-by for all of the commits > in different subsystems. I'm also fine with this going in through some > other subsys if anyone wants to take it? > > Best > Thx,Joel!:-) Hello,everyone! This patch series has been reviewed by Kees, Jan Kara, Christian Brauner, and acked by Anna Schumaker, Paul Moore. As Joel said, this patch series need to get reviewed-by for all of the commits in different subsystems. I would appreciate it if you could review this patch series as soon as possible !:-)