Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/192] 6.1.110-rc1 review

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 08:05:27PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sept 2024 at 18:24, Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Sept 2024 at 15:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.110 release.
> > > There are 192 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Thu, 12 Sep 2024 09:25:22 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.110-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> >
> > The SuperH defconfig builds failed due to following build warnings / errors
> > on the stable-rc linux-6.1.y.
> >
> > * SuperH, build
> >   - gcc-8-defconfig
> >   - gcc-11-shx3_defconfig
> >   - gcc-11-defconfig
> >   - gcc-8-shx3_defconfig
> >
> > Build log:
> > --------
> > In file included from  include/linux/mm.h:29,
> >                  from  arch/sh/kernel/asm-offsets.c:14:
> >  include/linux/pgtable.h: In function 'pmdp_get_lockless':
> >  include/linux/pgtable.h:379:20: error: 'pmd_t' has no member named 'pmd_low'
> >   379 |                 pmd.pmd_low = pmdp->pmd_low;
> >       |                    ^
> >  include/linux/pgtable.h:379:35: error: 'pmd_t' has no member named 'pmd_low'
> >   379 |                 pmd.pmd_low = pmdp->pmd_low;
> >       |                                   ^~
> >
> 
> Anders bisected this down to,
> # first bad commit:
>   [4f5373c50a1177e2a195f0ef6a6e5b7f64bf8b6c]
>   mm: Fix pmd_read_atomic()
>     [ Upstream commit 024d232ae4fcd7a7ce8ea239607d6c1246d7adc8 ]
> 
>   AFAICT there's no reason to do anything different than what we do for
>   PTEs. Make it so (also affects SH)

Ok, I'm going to drop this series as it shouldn't be breaking builds :(

thanks,

greg k-h