Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] module: prepare to handle ROX allocations for text

Mike Rapoport <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.alpha,gmane.linux.kernel.bpf,gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.hexagon,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.kernel.modules,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.arc,gmane.linux.uml.devel,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sparc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 03:23:40PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 11:10 AM Mike Rapoport <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> > index 88ecc5e9f523..7039f609c6ef 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/module.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> > @@ -367,6 +367,8 @@ enum mod_mem_type {
> >
> >  struct module_memory {
> >         void *base;
> > +       void *rw_copy;
> > +       bool is_rox;
> >         unsigned int size;
> 
> Do we really need to hold the rw_copy all the time? 

We hold it only during module initialization, it's freed in
post_relocation.

> Thanks,
> Song
> 
> [...]

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.