Re: [PATCH 13/13] sh/irq: use seq_put_decimal_ull_width() for decimal values

Hi David,

On Sat, 2024-11-09 at 00:26 +0800, David Wang wrote:
> Performance improvement for reading /proc/interrupts on arch sh
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/sh/kernel/irq.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c b/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c
> index 4e6835de54cf..9022d8af9d68 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -43,9 +43,9 @@ int arch_show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, int prec)
>  {
>  	int j;
>  
> -	seq_printf(p, "%*s: ", prec, "NMI");
> +	seq_printf(p, "%*s:", prec, "NMI");
>  	for_each_online_cpu(j)
> -		seq_printf(p, "%10u ", per_cpu(irq_stat.__nmi_count, j));
> +		seq_put_decimal_ull_width(p, " ", per_cpu(irq_stat.__nmi_count, j), 10);
>  	seq_printf(p, "  Non-maskable interrupts\n");
>  
>  	seq_printf(p, "%*s: %10u\n", prec, "ERR", atomic_read(&irq_err_count));

Sorry for the very late reply!

I don't quite understand why seq_put_decimal_ull_width() should be faster than seq_printf().

Can you elaborate on this a bit more?

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913