Re: [PATCH v3 -next 11/15] sunrpc: use vfs_pressure_ratio() helper
yukaixiong <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.nfs,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.kernel.lsm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2024/10/11 5:43, NeilBrown wrote: > On Fri, 11 Oct 2024, Jeff Layton wrote: >> On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 23:22 +0800, Kaixiong Yu wrote: >>> Use vfs_pressure_ratio() to simplify code. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kaixiong Yu <[email protected]> >>> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> >>> Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> net/sunrpc/auth.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth.c b/net/sunrpc/auth.c >>> index 04534ea537c8..3d2b51d7e934 100644 >>> --- a/net/sunrpc/auth.c >>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth.c >>> @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ static unsigned long >>> rpcauth_cache_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc) >>> >>> { >>> - return number_cred_unused * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure / 100; >>> + return vfs_pressure_ratio(number_cred_unused); >>> } >>> >>> static void >> Acked-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]> >> > I realise this is a bit of a tangent, and I'm not objecting to this > patch, but I wonder what the justification is for using > vfs_cache_pressure here. The sysctl is documented as > > This percentage value controls the tendency of the kernel to reclaim > the memory which is used for caching of directory and inode objects. > > So it can sensibly be used for dentries and inode, and for anything > directly related like the nfs access cache (which is attached to inodes) > and the nfs xattr cache. > > But the sunrpc cred cache scales with the number of active users, not > the number of inodes/dentries. > > So I think this should simply "return number_cred_unused;". > > What do others think? > > NeilBrown > > . Thank you, I will receive your advice.