Re: [PATCH v7] mm/memblock: Add memblock_alloc_or_panic interface

On Mon, 2024-12-23 at 09:12 +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 07:15:37PM +0800, Guo Weikang wrote:
> > Before SLUB initialization, various subsystems used memblock_alloc to
> > allocate memory. In most cases, when memory allocation fails, an immediate
> > panic is required. To simplify this behavior and reduce repetitive checks,
> > introduce `memblock_alloc_or_panic`. This function ensures that memory
> > allocation failures result in a panic automatically, improving code
> > readability and consistency across subsystems that require this behavior.
> > 
> > Changelog:
> > ----------
> > v1: initial version
> > v2: add __memblock_alloc_or_panic support panic output caller
> > v3: panic output phys_addr_t use printk's %pap
> > v4: make __memblock_alloc_or_panic out-of-line, move to memblock.c
> > v6: Fix CI compile error
> > Links to CI: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
> > v6: Fix CI compile warinigs
> > Links to CI: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
> > v7: add chagelog and adjust function declaration alignment format
> > ----------
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Weikang <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]>
> > Acked-by: Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]>
> 
> If people commented on your patch it does not mean you should add
> Reviewed-by or Acked-by tags for them. Wait for explicit tags from the
> reviewers.

And:

 - Acked-by: indicates an agreement by another developer (often a
   maintainer of the relevant code) that the patch is appropriate for
   inclusion into the kernel. 

I'm not a maintainer so I even don't have the right to use Acked-by :).

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University