Re: [PATCH v4 -next 00/15] sysctl: move sysctls from vm_table into its own files

On 2025/1/6 19:22, Joel Granados wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 09:40:50PM +0800, yukaixiong wrote:
>>
>> On 2024/12/28 20:15, Joel Granados wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 10:15:19PM +0800, Kaixiong Yu wrote:
>>>> This patch series moves sysctls of vm_table in kernel/sysctl.c to
>>>> places where they actually belong, and do some related code clean-ups.
>>>> After this patch series, all sysctls in vm_table have been moved into its
>>>> own files, meanwhile, delete vm_table.
> ...
>>>>     sysctl: remove unneeded include
>>> This patchset looks strange. There seems to be 15 patches, but there are
>>> 30 e-mails in the thread? You can also see this when you look at it in
>>> lore [1]. And they are different repeated e-mails (mutt does not
>>> de-duplicate them). Also `b4 shazam ...` does not work. What happened?
>>> Did you send it twice with the same mail ID? Am I the only one seeing
>>> this?
>>>
>>> I would suggest the following (hopefully you are using b4):
>>> 1. Check to see how things will be sent with b4. `b4 send --resend -o OUTPUT_DIR`
>>>      If you see 30 emails in that dir from your patchset then something is
>>>      still wrong.
>>> 2. After you make sure that everything is in order. Do the resend
>>>      without bumping the version up (leave it at version 4)
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> [1] : https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>> I'm very sorry, due to my mistake, 15 patches were sent twice.
> No worries. I saw that you have re-sent the patchset and it seems that
> this time there is only 15 mails. I see that you are only using my
> [email protected] ID; can you please add my kernel.org
> ([email protected]) mail to the future mails that you send (no
> need to re-send v4).
>
> Thx
>
> ...

OK, I will add [email protected] to the future mails.