Re: [PATCH v2 3/6 update] mm: pgtable: convert some architectures to use tlb_remove_ptdesc()
Qi Zheng <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.m68k,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.hexagon,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.uml.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/4/25 7:53 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 15:26:03 +0800 Qi Zheng <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Now, the nine architectures of csky, hexagon, loongarch, m68k, mips, >> nios2, openrisc, sh and um do not select CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE, >> and just call pagetable_dtor() + tlb_remove_page_ptdesc() (the wrapper of >> tlb_remove_page()). This is the same as the implementation of >> tlb_remove_{ptdesc|table}() under !CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_TABLE_FREE, so >> convert these architectures to use tlb_remove_ptdesc(). >> > > checkpatch warns. > > Do these things have to be macros? Switching to static inline fixes > the unused-arg warning in a nice fashion. This can be switched to static inline. In addition, I found that alpha, arc, microblaze, parisc, sparc32 and xtensa also have the unused-arg issue. Do I need to add a new patch to fix all of them, or just fix the newly added 11 warnings? > > I'll fix the trailing-semicolon issue locally. Thanks! > > WARNING: Argument 'address' is not used in function-like macro > #51: FILE: arch/csky/include/asm/pgalloc.h:64: > +#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, address) \ > + tlb_remove_ptdesc((tlb), page_ptdesc(pte)) > > WARNING: Argument 'addr' is not used in function-like macro > #66: FILE: arch/hexagon/include/asm/pgalloc.h:90: > +#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, addr) \ > + tlb_remove_ptdesc((tlb), page_ptdesc(pte)) > > WARNING: Argument 'address' is not used in function-like macro > #80: FILE: arch/loongarch/include/asm/pgalloc.h:58: > +#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, address) \ > + tlb_remove_ptdesc((tlb), page_ptdesc(pte)); > > WARNING: macros should not use a trailing semicolon > #80: FILE: arch/loongarch/include/asm/pgalloc.h:58: > +#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, address) \ > + tlb_remove_ptdesc((tlb), page_ptdesc(pte)); > > WARNING: Argument 'addr' is not used in function-like macro > #95: FILE: arch/m68k/include/asm/sun3_pgalloc.h:20: > +#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, addr) \ > + tlb_remove_ptdesc((tlb), page_ptdesc(pte)) > > WARNING: Argument 'address' is not used in function-like macro > #110: FILE: arch/mips/include/asm/pgalloc.h:51: > +#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, address) \ > + tlb_remove_ptdesc((tlb), page_ptdesc(pte)) > > WARNING: Argument 'addr' is not used in function-like macro > #125: FILE: arch/nios2/include/asm/pgalloc.h:31: > +#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, addr) \ > + tlb_remove_ptdesc((tlb), page_ptdesc(pte)) > > WARNING: Argument 'addr' is not used in function-like macro > #139: FILE: arch/openrisc/include/asm/pgalloc.h:67: > +#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, addr) \ > + tlb_remove_ptdesc((tlb), page_ptdesc(pte)) > > WARNING: Argument 'addr' is not used in function-like macro > #153: FILE: arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h:35: > +#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, addr) \ > + tlb_remove_ptdesc((tlb), page_ptdesc(pte)) > > WARNING: Argument 'address' is not used in function-like macro > #167: FILE: arch/um/include/asm/pgalloc.h:28: > +#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, address) \ > + tlb_remove_ptdesc((tlb), page_ptdesc(pte)) > > WARNING: Argument 'address' is not used in function-like macro > #176: FILE: arch/um/include/asm/pgalloc.h:33: > +#define __pmd_free_tlb(tlb, pmd, address) \ > + tlb_remove_ptdesc((tlb), virt_to_ptdesc(pmd)) > > WARNING: Argument 'address' is not used in function-like macro > #185: FILE: arch/um/include/asm/pgalloc.h:38: > +#define __pud_free_tlb(tlb, pud, address) \ > + tlb_remove_ptdesc((tlb), virt_to_ptdesc(pud)) > > total: 0 errors, 12 warnings, 122 lines checked > > NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to > mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. > > ./patches/mm-pgtable-convert-some-architectures-to-use-tlb_remove_ptdesc-v2.patch has style problems, please review. > > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report > them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. >