Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] arm: defconfig: drop RT_GROUP_SCHED=y from bcm2835/tegra/omap2plus

Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.tegra,gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.rpi,gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap
Message-ID <t2dustbykx2qd24wazjeiw5hch5nwr6z2ewmaf4srg6r2grwrf@rdw47chzkef2>
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 04:41:23AM +0800, Celeste Liu wrote:
> Commit 673ce00c5d6c ("ARM: omap2plus_defconfig: Add support for distros
> with systemd") said it's because of recommendation from systemd. But
> systemd changed their recommendation later.[1]
> 
> For cgroup v1, if turned on, and there's any cgroup in the "cpu" hierarchy it
> needs an RT budget assigned, otherwise the processes in it will not be able to
> get RT at all. The problem with RT group scheduling is that it requires the
> budget assigned but there's no way we could assign a default budget, since the
> values to assign are both upper and lower time limits, are absolute, and need to
> be sum up to < 1 for each individal cgroup. That means we cannot really come up
> with values that would work by default in the general case.[2]
> 
> For cgroup v2, it's almost unusable as well. If it turned on, the cpu controller
> can only be enabled when all RT processes are in the root cgroup. But it will
> lose the benefits of cgroup v2 if all RT process were placed in the same cgroup.
> 
> Red Hat, Gentoo, Arch Linux and Debian all disable it. systemd also doesn't
> support it.
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/f4e74be1856b3ac058acbf1be321c31d5299f69f
> [2]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229700
> 
> Tested-by: Stefan Wahren <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Celeste Liu <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/configs/bcm2835_defconfig   | 1 -
>  arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig | 1 -
>  arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig     | 1 -
>  3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)

Hi Arnd,

is this something that you could pick up? I think so far only the RISC-V
patch was picked up, but nobody seems to feel responsible for the ARM
patch here.

Thierry
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=P21d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.