Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] arm: defconfig: drop RT_GROUP_SCHED=y from bcm2835/tegra/omap2plus
Huacai Chen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.tegra,gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.rpi,gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAhV-H4fTGs-7EXE0EcR=P6GqHF2fokRE-kEte+cDmhjy=FYsA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 3:19 AM Thierry Reding <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 04:41:23AM +0800, Celeste Liu wrote: > > Commit 673ce00c5d6c ("ARM: omap2plus_defconfig: Add support for distros > > with systemd") said it's because of recommendation from systemd. But > > systemd changed their recommendation later.[1] > > > > For cgroup v1, if turned on, and there's any cgroup in the "cpu" hierarchy it > > needs an RT budget assigned, otherwise the processes in it will not be able to > > get RT at all. The problem with RT group scheduling is that it requires the > > budget assigned but there's no way we could assign a default budget, since the > > values to assign are both upper and lower time limits, are absolute, and need to > > be sum up to < 1 for each individal cgroup. That means we cannot really come up > > with values that would work by default in the general case.[2] > > > > For cgroup v2, it's almost unusable as well. If it turned on, the cpu controller > > can only be enabled when all RT processes are in the root cgroup. But it will > > lose the benefits of cgroup v2 if all RT process were placed in the same cgroup. > > > > Red Hat, Gentoo, Arch Linux and Debian all disable it. systemd also doesn't > > support it. > > > > [1]: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/f4e74be1856b3ac058acbf1be321c31d5299f69f > > [2]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229700 > > > > Tested-by: Stefan Wahren <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Celeste Liu <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/arm/configs/bcm2835_defconfig | 1 - > > arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig | 1 - > > arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig | 1 - > > 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-) > > Hi Arnd, > > is this something that you could pick up? I think so far only the RISC-V > patch was picked up, but nobody seems to feel responsible for the ARM > patch here. I will take the LoongArch patch, but may be squashed to another one about config file update. Huacai > > Thierry