Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces
Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.documentation,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.riscv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/13/25 16:05, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:31:12 -0700 Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah, as with my prior review, I'm a fan of this. It makes a bunch of my >>>> very noisy tests much easier to deal with. >>> >>> And for the record, we're also affected by this in DRM and would very >>> much like to get it merged in one shape or another. >>> >> >> I was unable to get maintainers of major architectures interested enough >> to provide feedback, and did not see a path forward. Maybe Alessandro >> has more success than me. > > I'll put them into mm.git, to advance things a bit. I haven't heard from kunit maintainers yet. This thread got lost in inbox due to travel. David/Brendan/Rae, Okay to take this series? Andrew, Okay to take this through your tree - this needs merging. thanks, -- Shuah