Re: [PATCH v2 00/57] irqdomain: Cleanups and Documentation
Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.comp.freedesktop.amd-gfx,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.msm,gmane.linux.documentation,gmane.linux.kernel.gpio,gmane.linux.kernel.iio,gmane.linux.drivers.i2c,gmane.linux.ports.arm.mediatek,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap,gmane.linux.kernel.pci,gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.kernel.rpi,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.arc,gmane.linux.sound,gmane.linux.uml.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.drivers.platform.x86.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06. 05. 25, 15:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19 2025 at 10:28, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> tl;dr if patches are agreed upon, I ask subsys maintainers to take the >> respective ones via their trees (as they are split per subsys), so that >> the IRQ tree can take only the rest. That would minimize churn/conflicts >> during merges. > > So. It's rc5 by now and I picked up everything Good, thanks. > which did not show up in next yet. Which is the majority -- routing through subsystems didn't work as well as I anticipated. I planned to retry with v3 after the next merge window, but you were faster. V3 contains a switch from nodes to dev_fwnode() in some cases. It simplifies the code there. This did not get lost, I will send this separately to maintainers once everything from this series settles in the tree. I.e. likely after the next merge window. > @Jiri, I fixed up all your subject prefixes as > > 'irqdomain: subsys: Switch to foo()' > > does not make any sense at all. These subsystems have their regular > prefixes and these changes do not justify made up irqdomain special > prefixes at all. Yes. thanks, -- js suse labs