Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] syscore: Pass context data to callbacks

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.pci,gmane.linux.acpi.devel,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <2025072218-decipher-spree-327d@gregkh>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 03:56:40PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 08:52:41AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 03:49:37PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 02:11:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 12:32:34PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> [...]
> > > 	struct syscore;
> > > 
> > > 	struct syscore_ops {
> > > 		int (*suspend)(struct syscore *syscore);
> > > 		void (*resume)(struct syscore *syscore);
> > > 		void (*shutdown)(struct syscore *syscore);
> > > 	};
> > > 
> > > 	struct syscore {
> > > 		const struct syscore_ops *ops;
> > > 		struct list_head node;
> > > 	};
> > > 
> > > Is that what you had in mind?
> > 
> > I missed the list_head, so yes, this would be better, but don't pass
> > back the syscore structure, how about just a void * instead, making the
> > whole container_of() stuff go away?
> 
> Yeah, that's a possibility. I personally don't like passing the void *
> around because it's easier to make mistakes that way. I also find it
> unintuitive because it doesn't immediately show you what the functions
> expect.
> 
> My understanding is that the container_of() should get optimized away
> most of the time, so there aren't any obvious downsides that I can see.

container_of() is just pointer math, but a cast is even faster :)

> But I don't feel very strongly, so if you have a strong preference for
> void pointers, I can do that.

That's what you really want to have here, it's a syscore data type
thing, that the callback wants to reference.  Just like a irqrequest_t
function passes back a void * that the handler "knows" how to deal with
properly.

thanks,

greg k-h
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.