Re: [PATCH 09/17] riscv: Add __attribute_const__ to ffs()-family implementations

Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.m68k,gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.alpha,gmane.linux.ports.hexagon,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sparc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Kees,

On 8/4/25 18:44, Kees Cook wrote:
> While tracking down a problem where constant expressions used by
> BUILD_BUG_ON() suddenly stopped working[1], we found that an added static
> initializer was convincing the compiler that it couldn't track the state
> of the prior statically initialized value. Tracing this down found that
> ffs() was used in the initializer macro, but since it wasn't marked with
> __attribute__const__, the compiler had to assume the function might
> change variable states as a side-effect (which is not true for ffs(),
> which provides deterministic math results).
>
> Add missing __attribute_const__ annotations to RISC-V's implementations of
> variable__ffs(), variable__fls(), and variable_ffs() functions. These are pure
> mathematical functions that always return the same result for the same
> input with no side effects, making them eligible for compiler optimization.
>
> Build tested ARCH=riscv defconfig with GCC riscv64-linux-gnu 14.2.0.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/364 [1]
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> ---
>   arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h
> index d59310f74c2b..77880677b06e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
>   #error "Unexpected BITS_PER_LONG"
>   #endif
>   
> -static __always_inline unsigned long variable__ffs(unsigned long word)
> +static __always_inline __attribute_const__ unsigned long variable__ffs(unsigned long word)
>   {
>   	asm goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[legacy]", "nop", 0,
>   				      RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, 1)
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long variable__ffs(unsigned long word)
>   	 (unsigned long)__builtin_ctzl(word) :	\
>   	 variable__ffs(word))
>   
> -static __always_inline unsigned long variable__fls(unsigned long word)
> +static __always_inline __attribute_const__ unsigned long variable__fls(unsigned long word)
>   {
>   	asm goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[legacy]", "nop", 0,
>   				      RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, 1)
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long variable__fls(unsigned long word)
>   	 (unsigned long)(BITS_PER_LONG - 1 - __builtin_clzl(word)) :	\
>   	 variable__fls(word))
>   
> -static __always_inline int variable_ffs(int x)
> +static __always_inline __attribute_const__ int variable_ffs(int x)
>   {
>   	asm goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[legacy]", "nop", 0,
>   				      RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, 1)


Tested-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>

Thanks,

Alex
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.