Re: [PATCH 18/19] perf: Introduce positive capability for raw events

Thomas Richter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded,gmane.linux.kernel.perf.user,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.alpha,gmane.linux.kernel.arc,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sparc,gmane.linux.power-management.general,gmane.linux.ports.arm.rockchip,gmane.comp.freedesktop.amd-gfx,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg.drivers.intel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.msm,gmane.linux.ports.riscv
Organization IBM
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/19/25 15:15, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 13/08/2025 6:01 pm, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Only a handful of CPU PMUs accept PERF_TYPE_{RAW,HARDWARE,HW_CACHE}
>> events without registering themselves as PERF_TYPE_RAW in the first
>> place. Add an explicit opt-in for these special cases, so that we can
>> make life easier for every other driver (and probably also speed up the
>> slow-path search) by having perf_try_init_event() do the basic type
>> checking to cover the majority of cases.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>
>> A further possibility is to automatically add the cap to PERF_TYPE_RAW
>> PMUs in perf_pmu_register() to have a single point-of-use condition; I'm
>> undecided...
>> ---
>>   arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c    |  1 +
>>   arch/s390/kernel/perf_pai_crypto.c |  2 +-
>>   arch/s390/kernel/perf_pai_ext.c    |  2 +-
>>   arch/x86/events/core.c             |  2 +-
>>   drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c             |  1 +
>>   include/linux/perf_event.h         |  1 +
>>   kernel/events/core.c               | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>   7 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
>> index 1a94e0944bc5..782ab755ddd4 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c
>> @@ -1054,6 +1054,7 @@ static void cpumf_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>>   /* Performance monitoring unit for s390x */
>>   static struct pmu cpumf_pmu = {
>>       .task_ctx_nr  = perf_sw_context,
>> +    .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_RAW_EVENTS,
>>       .pmu_enable   = cpumf_pmu_enable,
>>       .pmu_disable  = cpumf_pmu_disable,
>>       .event_init   = cpumf_pmu_event_init,
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_pai_crypto.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_pai_crypto.c
>> index a64b6b056a21..b5b6d8b5d943 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_pai_crypto.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_pai_crypto.c
>> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *paicrypt_attr_groups[] = {
>>   /* Performance monitoring unit for mapped counters */
>>   static struct pmu paicrypt = {
>>       .task_ctx_nr  = perf_hw_context,
>> -    .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_SAMPLING,
>> +    .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_SAMPLING | PERF_PMU_CAP_RAW_EVENTS,
>>       .event_init   = paicrypt_event_init,
>>       .add          = paicrypt_add,
>>       .del          = paicrypt_del,
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_pai_ext.c b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_pai_ext.c
>> index 1261f80c6d52..bcd28c38da70 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/perf_pai_ext.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/perf_pai_ext.c
>> @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *paiext_attr_groups[] = {
>>   /* Performance monitoring unit for mapped counters */
>>   static struct pmu paiext = {
>>       .task_ctx_nr  = perf_hw_context,
>> -    .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_SAMPLING,
>> +    .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_SAMPLING | PERF_PMU_CAP_RAW_EVENTS,
>>       .event_init   = paiext_event_init,
>>       .add          = paiext_add,
>>       .del          = paiext_del,
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
>> index 789dfca2fa67..764728bb80ae 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
>> @@ -2697,7 +2697,7 @@ static bool x86_pmu_filter(struct pmu *pmu, int cpu)
>>   }
>>     static struct pmu pmu = {
>> -    .capabilities        = PERF_PMU_CAP_SAMPLING,
>> +    .capabilities        = PERF_PMU_CAP_SAMPLING | PERF_PMU_CAP_RAW_EVENTS,
>>         .pmu_enable        = x86_pmu_enable,
>>       .pmu_disable        = x86_pmu_disable,
>> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
>> index 72d8f38d0aa5..bc772a3bf411 100644
>> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
>> @@ -877,6 +877,7 @@ struct arm_pmu *armpmu_alloc(void)
>>            * specific PMU.
>>            */
>>           .capabilities    = PERF_PMU_CAP_SAMPLING |
>> +                  PERF_PMU_CAP_RAW_EVENTS |
>>                     PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS |
>>                     PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE,
>>       };
>> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> index 183b7c48b329..c6ad036c0037 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ struct perf_event_pmu_context;
>>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_HW_TYPE    0x0100
>>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_PAUSE        0x0200
>>   #define PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_PREFER_LARGE    0x0400
>> +#define PERF_PMU_CAP_RAW_EVENTS        0x0800
>>     /**
>>    * pmu::scope
>> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
>> index 71b2a6730705..2ecee76d2ae2 100644
>> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
>> @@ -12556,11 +12556,26 @@ static inline bool has_extended_regs(struct perf_event *event)
>>              (event->attr.sample_regs_intr & PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK);
>>   }
>>   +static bool is_raw_pmu(const struct pmu *pmu)
>> +{
>> +    return pmu->type == PERF_TYPE_RAW ||
>> +           pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_RAW_EVENTS;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int perf_try_init_event(struct pmu *pmu, struct perf_event *event)
>>   {
>>       struct perf_event_context *ctx = NULL;
>>       int ret;
>>   +    /*
>> +     * Before touching anything, we can safely skip:
>> +     * - any event for a specific PMU which is not this one
>> +     * - any common event if this PMU doesn't support them
>> +     */
>> +    if (event->attr.type != pmu->type &&
>> +        (event->attr.type >= PERF_TYPE_MAX || is_raw_pmu(pmu)))
> 
> Ah, that should be "!is_raw_pmu(pmu)" there (although it's not entirely the cause of the LKP report on the final patch.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin.
> 
>> +        return -ENOENT;
>> +
>>       if (!try_module_get(pmu->module))
>>           return -ENODEV;
>>   
> 
> 

Hi Robin,

what is the intention of that patch?
Can you explain that a bit more.

Thanks.

-- 
Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany
--
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH

Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt

Geschäftsführung: David Faller

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.