Re: [PATCH RESEND 28/62] init: alpha, arc, arm, arm64, csky, m68k, microblaze, mips, nios2, openrisc, parisc, powerpc, s390, sh, sparc, um, x86, xtensa: rename initrd_{start,end} to virt_external_initramfs_{start,end}

Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch,gmane.linux.ports.alpha,gmane.linux.kernel.arc,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.hexagon,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sparc,gmane.linux.uml.devel,gmane.linux.block,gmane.linux.kernel.initramfs,gmane.linux.kernel.api,gmane.linux.documentation,gmane.linux.kernel.efi,gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4,gmane.linux.acpi.devel,gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree
Message-ID <20250913054837.GAaMUFtd4YlaPqL2Ov@fat_crate.local>
On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 12:38:07AM +0000, Askar Safin wrote:
> Rename initrd_start to virt_external_initramfs_start and
> initrd_end to virt_external_initramfs_end.

"virt" as in "virtualization"?

That's not confusing at all... :-\

And "external" means what?

> They refer to initramfs, not to initrd

Why not simply initramfs_{start,end} if they belong to it?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.