Re: [PATCH RESEND 00/62] initrd: remove classic initrd support
Askar Safin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.uml.devel,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch,gmane.linux.ports.alpha,gmane.linux.kernel.arc,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.hexagon,gmane.linux.ports.mips,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sparc,gmane.linux.block,gmane.linux.kernel.initramfs,gmane.linux.kernel.api,gmane.linux.documentation,gmane.linux.kernel.efi,gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4,gmane.linux.acpi.devel,gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPnZJGAjfpHZn_VzU3ry9ZV6OUS0RN2iWos153_oM_PhVbMgVg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 4:34 PM Christian Brauner <[email protected]> wrote: > Split it up into multiple patch series. Send a first series that > focusses only on removing the generic infrastructure keeping it as > contained as possible. Only do non-generic cleanups that are absolutely > essential for the removal. Then the cleanups can go in separate series > later. Ok, I will do this. I will send a minimal patchset with arch/ changes kept to absolute minimum or even absent. Nearly all of the changes will be in init/ and docs. Hopefully it will pass via the VFS tree. If it gets to kernel release, I will consider sending more patchsets. -- Askar Safin