Re: [PATCH] arch/sh: Drop CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID from defconfig files
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.comp.video.dri.devel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.mips |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMuHMdX5B6LpZ5ffaOc0Et0PK+G=_c8yD5K8JynRwu5T8rHfsw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Thomas, CC arm/mips/ppc, as you sent similar patches for these arches. On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 at 10:40, Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> wrote: > CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID=y depends on X86 or EFI_GENERIC_STUB. Neither is > true here, so drop the lines from the defconfig files. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> Thanks for your patch! Upon first look, your changes match the (current) dependencies of FIRMWARE_EDID. The dependency on X86 was added in commit 7e35fc7ab433683f ("video: Make CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID generally available") in v6.17-rc1. However, CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID also protects fb_firmware_edid(), which seems to extract the EDID from the PCI ROM, and is thus not x86-specific? That function is only ever called by three fbdev drivers (i810, nv, savagefb), though. I assume none of these work on SuperH, so Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds