Re: [PATCH 1/2] sh: cache: remove unused but set variables in sh4_flush_cache_range
Thorsten Blum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 11:46:38AM -0400, Zi Yan wrote: > On 23 Apr 2026, at 10:53, Thorsten Blum wrote: > > > Remove 'start' and 'end' to avoid two "variable set but not used" > > warnings triggered by -Wunused-but-set-variable. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/sh/mm/cache-sh4.c | 3 --- > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/cache-sh4.c b/arch/sh/mm/cache-sh4.c > > index 83fb34b39ca7..9776027382cc 100644 > > --- a/arch/sh/mm/cache-sh4.c > > +++ b/arch/sh/mm/cache-sh4.c > > @@ -284,11 +284,8 @@ static void sh4_flush_cache_range(void *args) > > { > > struct flusher_data *data = args; > > struct vm_area_struct *vma; > > - unsigned long start, end; > > > > vma = data->vma; > > - start = data->addr1; > > - end = data->addr2; > > > > if (cpu_context(smp_processor_id(), vma->vm_mm) == NO_CONTEXT) > > return; > > Is the comment above the function considered stale too? Yes, that should be removed too. I will send a v2. > “START, END: Virtual Address (U0 address)” and the NOTE. I think the NOTE is still relevant as it explains why flush_dcache_all() is used. > Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <[email protected]> Thanks, Thorsten