Re: [PATCH 2/3] bpf: arena: use page_ref_count() instead of page_mapped() in arena_free_pages()

Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.bpf,gmane.linux.kernel.mm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:43:15 +0200 "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Pages that BPF arena code maps are allocated through
> bpf_map_alloc_pages(), which does not allocate folios but pages.
> 
> In the future, pages will not have a mapcount, only folios will.
> Converting the code to use folios and rely on folio_mapped() sounds like
> the wrong approach.
> 
> Should BPF arena code allocate folios and use folio_mapped() here? But
> likely we would not want to use folios here longterm, as we don't really
> need folio information.
> 
> Hard to tell. But in the meantime, we can simply use the page refcount
> instead, as a heuristic whether the page might be mapped to user space
> and we would want to try zapping it, so we can get rid of page_mapped().
> 
> Page allocation will give us a page with a refcount of 1. Any user space
> mapping adds a page reference. While there can be references from other
> subsystems (e.g., GUP), in the common case for this test here relying on
> the page count is good enough.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/arena.c | 2 +-

BPF maintainers will probably want to carry this in the BPF tree. 
That's fine - please go ahead and add it.  I'll carry a duplicate in
mm.git so it compiles.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.