Re: Toybox make root no longer works as expected
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6bd93131318b8e78d49fdc5f3e5fecc053f9c046.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> |
On Fri, 2026-05-01 at 16:27 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > What about the patches for J2 support? And can it work with a GCC git tree like [1]? > > They're in musl-cross-make. > > https://github.com/richfelker/musl-cross-make/tree/master/patches/binutils-2.44 > > https://github.com/richfelker/musl-cross-make/tree/master/patches/gcc-9.4.0 > > Two in each, I think. (Base support and then a later fdpic bugfix.) > > Alas, due to the way Rich maintains musl-cross-make (which is INSANE) if > you want to know WHY any of the patches was added (relevant gcc bugzilla > entry and so on) you have to find the first release it was added to and > log THAT patch to find the commit message, because he never puts helpful > comments at the start of the actual files and the commit where the issue > was first dealt with is sometimes quite the hunt. > > Another reason I wanted to migrate off mcm... > > Lemme know if you need me to dig for the source of the fdpic bugfix > thingies, I knew once but don't have it lying around. (Jeff might?) > > Oh, right also invented his own patch applying infrastructure (cowpatch) > which is like fuzz support but worse: silently eats failures of patches > to apply. I don't understand why it exists... Hmm, sounds like a bit too much to be able to do that in a short time now in order to be able to test the kernel patch. I guess I will merge the patch now anyways and send it to Linus unless someone else has done that already anyway. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913