Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] sh: mach-rsk: rsk7203: use static device properties for LEDs and GPIO buttons
Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.renesas-soc,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.gpio |
|---|---|
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 04:52:37PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 02:45:34AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 03:06:14PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 01:02:56AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 10:13:19PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
...
> > > > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rsk7203_devices); i++) {
> > > >
> > > > for (unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rsk7203_devices); i++) {
> > > >
> > > > ...and drop the above definition of i.
> > >
> > > Why? I do not see coding style suggesting this.
> >
> > Linus Torvalds.
>
> Context matters.
>
> If you want this to be a universal requirement work on adding this to
> coding style and to checkpatch. Otherwise declaring loop iterator inside
> the loop can be beneficial but in many cases it does not really matter
> and can be left to the code author and the revealing style for the
> affected code area.
From the common sense perspective this makes code shorter and isolated, which
is a good thing as it makes it robust against wrong re-use of the iterator
variable.
Anyway, I replied already with a link.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko