Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] rsk7203: switch to using static device property, drop legacy gpio API
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> Sat, 11 Jul 2026 07:14:48 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.renesas-soc,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.gpio |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <f9fc5cb2ae36593db9db8faf7ebcdc224842f9a0.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de> |
Hello Linus, On Fri, 2026-07-10 at 21:05 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 7:08=E2=80=AFAM Dmitry Torokhov > <[email protected]> wrote: >=20 > > Gentle ping on this series... It still applies cleanly and we need this > > to be able top drop legacy gpio interfaces from gpio-keys (and > > eventually from the kernel). >=20 > I lost my patience and queued it to the pinctrl tree on an immutable > branch: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/= log/?h=3Dib-rsk7204 >=20 > Then I merged this for v7.3. I'm sorry, but I wasn't aware that this was an urgent patch. I'm doing this as a hobbyist and I'm working on my own pace as I cannot always spend time working on kernel maintenance. I'm usually collecting patches from patchwork [1] for review and then merge them in batches if they're fine. What I don't understand, why did you choose to use an immutable tree? Is th= ere really a need for such an escalation? I find that a bit rude. The v2 patch = series was sent first in May, so I didn't think this was already a long time. Thanks, Adrian > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-sh/list/ --=20 .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913