[linux-sh:03372] Re: Stable Linux Tool Chain

"Mark Feller" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Of the toolchains available at sh-linux.org, which are best/stable for
> working with the 2.6.x kernels?  The gcc 3.4.1 stuff is listed as "very
> experimental", but there are a few gcc versions underneath this link,
> including a v3.2.3 version.  How stable are the binutils under this link?

Perhaps what is the best depends on what you want to do actually.
I think that the both compilers at sh-linux.org are stable.
Please don't forget that one specific version of a software might
require limited versions of gcc to build it correctly.  This isn't
the case for many userland programs but is prominent for kernel
and glibc.
I believe that any binutils 2.13.90 and after would be stable
enough for the almost normal works.
If you want the other gcc-glibc combinations, you can try Dan Kegel's
crosstool

  http://kegel.com/crosstool/

Regards,
	kaz