Re: Status of ST40 on the 2.6 tree

On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 02:06:36PM +0100, Alex Bennee wrote:
> At the moment I am tweaking the PCI stuff to get it to compile nicely
> (and removing some of the HARP specific bits out of the st40 pci code).
> So is anyone running 2.6 with ST40 at the mo or is it currently
> untested?
> 
> Stuart, do you have a 2.6 tree with un-merged stuff in it. I can attempt
> a resync along the lines of what I did with 2.4 if you've got changes
> waiting to go in but not had a chance to test.
> 
I've got some outstanding st40 bits to merge for 2.4 that SuperH pushed
in from ST's tree by way of BK, which is mostly in addition to the changes
you already made earlier. My intention was to sync this up on the 2.6 side
as well, which is half-merged presently.

The current ST40 stuff seems to be rather untested though. I don't believe
it's even been compile tested in newer kernels, so there may be a bit of
unresolved backend work to do.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAjmA+1K+teJFxZ9wRAqdbAJ95a1zLtm8clzwyyPeGtS92lqJ+XQCdHTFN
1w7Wr8uo1PCr/8wAFN7ZNgo=
=kNbD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----