Re: Re: [linux-sh:03224] SH SCI output weirdness...

On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 21:48, Stuart MENEFY wrote:
> However, for the moment I've simply got back to the 2.4 version of the code.
> 
Ahh. Does that mean you have a 2.6 kernel tree somewhere? I've been
looking through the CVS code trying to get it up and running on my board
and one thing I've noticed is the ST40 stuff seems a little out of date
(pre the merges I did on 2.4) .

My current plan is to forward port the merges I did into 2.4 into 2.6
(time.c and pci-st40.c to start with). However if you have a more
current tree I can certainly go through that re-sync stuff into the
LinuxSH CVS like I did for 2.4

Paul also has a bunch of stuff waiting to be merged from his bk tree
into 2.4 (and I assume 2.6) which I said I'd look at. It breaks down to:

* Board specific stuff (which I could merge but have no way of testing)
* ST40 PCI fix (asbytes stuff which make no difference on my h/w)
* ST40 Clock and PIO additions (which I'm unfamiliar with)

-- 
Alex, homepage: http://www.bennee.com/~alex/
That does not compute.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. 
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click