Re: SPARC64: Modular floppy?
"Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.ultrapenguin,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | OSDL |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Horst von Brand wrote: > "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> said: > >>On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:07:43 -0300 >>Horst von Brand <[email protected]> wrote: > > > [...] > > >>>So, either the dependencies have to get fixed so floppy can't be modular >>>for this architecture, or the relevant functions have to move from entry.S >>>to the module. > > >>I think the former is the best solution. The assembler code really >>needs to get at floppy.c symbols. > > >>From my cursory look the stuff depending on the floppy.c symbols is just > in the floppy-related code. Can't that be just included in floppy.c? > (Could be quite a mess, but it looks like short stretches). The code in entry.S looks self-contained (to me:), so moving it somewhere else should just be a SMOP (mostly kbuild stuff).... -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ultralinux" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html