Re: [PATCH 1/6] {set,clear,test}_bit() related cleanup
Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.ia64,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.hppa,gmane.linux.ports.ppc.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sparc,gmane.linux.ports.ultrapenguin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi!
> While working on these patch set, I found several possible cleanup
> on x86-64 and ia64.
It is probably not your fault, but...
> Index: 2.6-git/include/asm-x86_64/mmu_context.h
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6-git.orig/include/asm-x86_64/mmu_context.h 2006-01-25 19:07:15.000000000 +0900
> +++ 2.6-git/include/asm-x86_64/mmu_context.h 2006-01-25 19:13:59.000000000 +0900
> @@ -34,12 +34,12 @@
> unsigned cpu = smp_processor_id();
> if (likely(prev != next)) {
> /* stop flush ipis for the previous mm */
> - clear_bit(cpu, &prev->cpu_vm_mask);
> + cpu_clear(cpu, prev->cpu_vm_mask);
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> write_pda(mmu_state, TLBSTATE_OK);
> write_pda(active_mm, next);
> #endif
> - set_bit(cpu, &next->cpu_vm_mask);
> + cpu_set(cpu, next->cpu_vm_mask);
> load_cr3(next->pgd);
>
> if (unlikely(next->context.ldt != prev->context.ldt))
cpu_set sounds *very* ambiguous. We have thing called cpusets, for
example. I'd not guess that is set_bit in cpu endianity (is it?).
Pavel
--
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html