[patch 13/47] generic sched_find_first_bit()

Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.sparc,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.ia64,gmane.linux.ports.hppa,gmane.linux.ports.ppc.devel,gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel,gmane.linux.ports.ultrapenguin
Message-ID <[email protected]>
sched-bitops.patch (application/octet-stream, 1.7 KB)
This patch introduces the C-language equivalent of the function:
int sched_find_first_bit(const unsigned long *b);

In include/asm-generic/bitops/sched.h

This code largely copied from:
include/asm-powerpc/bitops.h

Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <[email protected]>
 include/asm-generic/bitops/sched.h |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+)

Index: 2.6-rc/include/asm-generic/bitops/sched.h
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ 2.6-rc/include/asm-generic/bitops/sched.h
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+#ifndef _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_SCHED_H_
+#define _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_SCHED_H_
+
+#include <linux/compiler.h>	/* unlikely() */
+#include <asm/types.h>
+
+/*
+ * Every architecture must define this function. It's the fastest
+ * way of searching a 140-bit bitmap where the first 100 bits are
+ * unlikely to be set. It's guaranteed that at least one of the 140
+ * bits is cleared.
+ */
+static inline int sched_find_first_bit(const unsigned long *b)
+{
+#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
+	if (unlikely(b[0]))
+		return __ffs(b[0]);
+	if (unlikely(b[1]))
+		return __ffs(b[1]) + 64;
+	return __ffs(b[2]) + 128;
+#elif BITS_PER_LONG == 32
+	if (unlikely(b[0]))
+		return __ffs(b[0]);
+	if (unlikely(b[1]))
+		return __ffs(b[1]) + 32;
+	if (unlikely(b[2]))
+		return __ffs(b[2]) + 64;
+	if (b[3])
+		return __ffs(b[3]) + 96;
+	return __ffs(b[4]) + 128;
+#else
+#error BITS_PER_LONG not defined
+#endif
+}
+
+#endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_SCHED_H_ */

--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.