Re: A tiny patch for env.sh & busyelks.

Hi Laura,

I think ELKS would need additional memory support beyond 1 MB to properly 
support busybox and further applications. ELKS could add support for the 
80386 processor for that.

Georg

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- 
From: LM
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2020 9:11 PM
To: ELKS
Subject: Re: A tiny patch for env.sh & busyelks.

On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 2:36 PM Jody Bruchon <[email protected]> wrote:
>Things should be much better today, but I didn't feel like
working on it any longer. It would work if someone with a little C
coding skill massaged it a bit. The biggest challenge is keeping the
binaries small enough.

It's a really interesting project.  I'm working on something similar
for some other platforms.  I don't think I could write anything
efficient enough to suit this project.  However, if anyone does pick
up development, I would love to compare notes, design ideas and
algorithms for doing this sort of thing.