Re: [PATCH net-next] net: appletalk: remove Apple/Farallon LocalTalk PC support

James Carlson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ppp,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.documentation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 5/11/22 04:23, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> indication of appletalk ever being supported there, this all looks
> IPv4/IPv6 specific. There was support for PPP_IPX until it was
> dropped this year (the kernel side got removed in 2018), but never
> for PPP_AT.
> Adding Paul Mackerras to Cc, he might know more about it.

I waited a bit before chipping in, as I think Paul would know more.

The ATCP stuff was in at least a few vendor branches, but I don't think
it ever made it into the main distribution. These commits seem to be
where the (disabled by default) references to it first appeared:

commit 50c9469f0f683c7bf8ebad9b7f97bfc03c6a4122
Author: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Mar 4 03:32:37 1997 +0000

    add defs for appletalk

commit 01548ef15e0f41f9f6af33860fb459a7f578f004
Author: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Mar 4 03:41:17 1997 +0000

    connect time stuff gone to auth.c,
    don't die on EINTR from opening tty,
    ignore NCP packets during authentication,
    fix recursive signal problem in kill_my_pg

The disabled-by-default parts were likely support contributions for
those other distributions. (Very likely in BSD.)

I would've thought AppleTalk was completely gone by now, and I certainly
would not be sad to see the dregs removed from pppd, but there was a
patch release on the netatalk package just last month, so what do I know?

(The only possible reason I can see to keep any ATCP bits around at all
is to make sure we can write nice-looking log messages -- to say we're
rejecting "AppleTalk Control Protocol" rather than "unknown 8029." But
that'd be a very minor feature.)

-- 
James Carlson     42.703N 71.076W FN42lq08    <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.