Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] net: Improve netns handling in RTNL and ip_tunnel

Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.can,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.drivers.rdma,gmane.linux.kernel.bpf,gmane.linux.ppp,gmane.network.wireguard,gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general,gmane.org.freifunk.batman,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 22:32:39 +0800 Xiao Liang wrote:
> This patch series includes some netns-related improvements and fixes for
> RTNL and ip_tunnel, to make link creation more intuitive:
> 
>  - Creating link in another net namespace doesn't conflict with link names
>    in current one.
>  - Refector rtnetlink link creation. Create link in target namespace
>    directly. Pass both source and link netns to drivers via newlink()
>    callback.
> 
> So that
> 
>   # ip link add netns ns1 link-netns ns2 tun0 type gre ...
> 
> will create tun0 in ns1, rather than create it in ns2 and move to ns1.
> And don't conflict with another interface named "tun0" in current netns.

## Form letter - net-next-closed

The merge window for v6.13 has begun and net-next is closed for new drivers,
features, code refactoring and optimizations. We are currently accepting
bug fixes only.

Please repost when net-next reopens after Dec 2nd.

RFC patches sent for review only are welcome at any time.

See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#development-cycle
-- 
pw-bot: defer
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.