Re: MacOS 10.6
Matt Broughton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.printing.gimp-print.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 1:23 PM, Steve Letter via Gimp-print-devel <[email protected]> wrote: > > The only easily implemented option to continue support for Snow Leopard is to build a second version without signing. I haven't tested this but I think it would work. Is this something we really want though? > > Steve Letter You're never to old to learn something stupid. -- unknown Just thinking out loud here. Would it make more sense to build an unsigned package for Snow Leopard 10.6 through Sierra 10.12? I'm thinking that may may provide a longer term solution. We would then have a fat binary with x86_64 and arm64 with a signed package for later versions of macos. Matt _______________________________________________ Gimp-print-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gimp-print-devel