Re: 10 raw channels with photo and matte key

Andrew X <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.printing.gimp-print.devel
Message-ID <CADFctWwgFJ9mGnS6FJYOF4S1d1dXn8=OxF=pvAv1WYR5bo4k-A@mail.gmail.com>
But most of epson use 8ch printhead for 9 colors and switch mk/pk with
inkselector. And I think with 10ch printhead we have a chance that all ten
channels can have their own addresses for each channel. I'm not familiar
with analyzing printer data, but I have p900 printer and can make any
experiments with it if you tell me what to do and help to analyzing data to
find Chanel addresses for mk/pk or to be sure it's not possible to use 10ch
at one time.

Can you recommend channel/subchannel numbers to test first of all?

сб, 19 февр. 2022 г., 03:37 Robert Krawitz <[email protected]>:

> On 2/16/22 18:19, Andrew X wrote:
> > I know how it's work on p600/p800/3880 etc 8ch heads. On p700/900
> printhead have 10 physical
> > channels, print 10nozzle patterns and I want to manage all 10 channels
> in raw mode
>
> The only printers I know of where it might work are the R800/R1800/R1900.
> All of the other printers
> use the same code for matte and photo black ink, and the printer switches
> between them based on the
> initialization code.
>
> > чт, 17 февр. 2022 г., 02:11 Michael Sweet via Gimp-print-devel
> > <[email protected] <mailto:
> [email protected]>>:
> >
> >     I believe the print head only supports 9 channels at a time and
> physically switches between the
> >     matte and photo black supply when you load the media (or at least
> that's how my P800 works... :)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gimp-print-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gimp-print-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Gimp-print-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gimp-print-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.