Re: [patch] Minor PAGG attach/detach semantic change for 2.6.11

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 09:33:01AM -0500, Erik Jacobson wrote:
> Kingsley - my first attempt skipped the list, sorry.
> 
> > While testing the propagation of pagg_attach errors to fork() I
> > noticed that the detach callback is called again for the client
> 
> I'm sorry it's taking a while for me to get back to you.
> I had kicked your patch around to a couple people internally and
> I think we want to investigate the error path more before we
> take it as part of the PAGG patch.
> 
> Does anybody else on the list have thoughts on this change?
> 
> Thanks for the submission. I'd like to do a bit more research.

Hi Erik, 

Has there been any progress on this?

Thanks,
-- 
		Kingsley