Re: keep on patchin'
Craig Small <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Oct 2020 19:40:36 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.procps.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALy8Cw4_CZ5wfASFtAtZM=OemqQ8ot+GTGand4=X6_yp3En9FQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 05:00, Jim Warner <[email protected]> wrote: > perform this extra step. But is there a way to clean the library after > the test so that it's rebuilt without ITEMTABLE_DEBUG should another > make be issued? > The pushed change cleans before and after the build/test. > And I agree it would be better if just the library was rebuilt with this > new target. It would be even better if no library test programs were > built until needed (check or check-lib). > It only builds test_Itemtables and the library now. I also removed test_Itemtables from the test programs because we don't normally need to run this with make check. Hmm, there is still something about test programs being made during make instead of make test. > make[3]: *** [Makefile:524: check-DEJAGNU] Error 1 > make[2]: *** [Makefile:599: check-am] Error 2 > OK, above that somewhere is the real error. That would be worth checking out. Make is correctly aborting because dejagnu is reporting an error. My guess is a timing/grep issue, it is almost always this. WARNING: Couldn't find tool init file > You can ignore that warning. - Craig