Re: three for newlib

On 12/15/21 3:14 PM, Craig Small wrote:
> ...
> For top, it currently just dies but it's an interesting question; for 
> the summary part for sure it's not going to work, but what about the 
> process list? It could work (for most fields), but is it worthwhile 
> making that happen?
> 
Hi Craig,

I had completely overlooked issue #227 and was unaware of the /proc 
subset=pid provision.

Let me see if/how top could be adapted to provide reduced functionality 
under such circumstances.

Regards,

Jim