Re: three for newlib
Jim Warner <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Dec 2021 13:28:52 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.procps.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/16/21 3:48 AM, Craig Small wrote: > At first I was, well they won't work and for oldlib it probably would > be too difficult. With newlib I've think we have a chance to get some of > these working. > It puts the library into an interesting state too. Hi Craig, Attached is my attempt at a top subset=pid response. I think we're approaching this from the correct direction. Namely, this issue shouldn't involve the library at all. Rather, each application must decide if and how it responds to an otherwise fatal error. And I also agree that oldlib should be ignored. Any feedback would be welcomed. Regards, Jim p.s. I made no effort to update NEWS - thought it best to wait 'til the dust settles.
newlib-just-1.tgz
(application/x-compressed-tar, 2.9 KB) - not displayed