Re: issue #245 plus one
Craig Small <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:30:18 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.procps.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALy8Cw48=r2tJxAe_xbqQjedqU7xexqZQgahyemPreEt5_UMVg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Jim, newlib and master branches are pushed. I was working on a small test to see what was going on with fatal_proc_unmounted() when you use it to get values for the calling process. Added a caveat to the man page so it doesn't ruin someone's several days trying to work out why it returns PPID but not PID. Looking at most of the dependent programs I've come to several conclusions: * Most will be simple changes, there was one that is half implementing it's own proc parsing half using libprocps that will have issues. * Most call libprocps functions in a not-great way but I'm just updating the API not fixing it. * No matter how much you hate the build system you're used to, it's worse using someone else's build system. - Craig On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 20:30, Jim Warner <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/26/22 1:39 AM, Jim Warner wrote: > > After a push I'll give Tyson a heads up and port #0002 to the master > > branch. > > Now that newlib is updated, here's the master branch catch up. > > Thanks in advance for the push. > > Jim >