Re: Next for newlib?

"Craig Small" <[email protected]> ("csmall") Mon, 29 Aug 2022 21:21:43 +1000
Newsgroups gmane.linux.procps.devel
Message-ID <CALy8Cw7XfRmGaUuxiQZERwcxVRiEByAhyADpbw1W1xVT9NNUfA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 18:57, Jim Warner <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 8/24/22 4:22 PM, Craig Small (csmall) wrote:
> > So that would mean for install we would have:
> > /usr/include/libproc2/*.h
> > /usr/lib/<triplet>/libproc-2.so
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> Why not drop the dash on the library itself?  Using 'libproc2'
> consistently just feels better.
>
Good idea.
I've made all the changes now. I think everything is ok.
The main question I had was the programs including the library headers. The
Makefile adds a -Ilibrary/include so they can just include "pids.h"
and the same for local, but not sure if that's the right way.

Anyway, have a look and let me know what you think.

 - Craig