Re: Next for newlib?
"Craig Small" <[email protected]> ("csmall") Mon, 29 Aug 2022 21:21:43 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.procps.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALy8Cw7XfRmGaUuxiQZERwcxVRiEByAhyADpbw1W1xVT9NNUfA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 18:57, Jim Warner <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/24/22 4:22 PM, Craig Small (csmall) wrote: > > So that would mean for install we would have: > > /usr/include/libproc2/*.h > > /usr/lib/<triplet>/libproc-2.so > > Hi Craig, > > Why not drop the dash on the library itself? Using 'libproc2' > consistently just feels better. > Good idea. I've made all the changes now. I think everything is ok. The main question I had was the programs including the library headers. The Makefile adds a -Ilibrary/include so they can just include "pids.h" and the same for local, but not sure if that's the right way. Anyway, have a look and let me know what you think. - Craig