RE: RE Digital Venturis P166 thin clients problems PROGRESS!
Craig Falconer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.pxes.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Avonside Girls' High School |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I've compiled my working kernel monolithically, disabling modules... But pxesconfig seems to expect modules to be available. I know exactly what hardware is in these machines, so modules seems a bit of a waste. Is this right? -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tim Bates Sent: Thursday, 19 February 2004 4:37 p.m. To: [email protected] Subject: Re: RE [pxes-devel] Digital Venturis P166 thin clients problems PROGRESS! Whatever you do... Note how you fixed it NOW (somewhere near the box you comile kernels on). In 2 weeks time you will have forgotten something like that. I'd personally make 2 kernels based on the one config, with only that one change. Then set the IP's for the dodgy boxes to a certain range and make that range grab the "fixed" kernel. Yes thank you Diego... I've managed to prove that it's a compile-time > option to the 8139too module. I've brewed a kernel that boots on the > hardware bu turning on "Use PIO rather than MMIO" > > My question now is how to use this kernel without disrupting the other > machines. Should I recompile the module? Or should I compile a monolithic > kernel for these machines? What other kernel options are required? ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click