Re: PXES on a thin client
Ben Wang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.pxes.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
That Vortex86 box is known as the eBox-II, its now superceeded by eBox-2.6, same outlook but different layout and adds serial ports and most importantly, 100%. fanless. It also solves a problem with the parallel port with printers. Theres also the eBox-III just around the corner (uses Via Eden-N processor and also 100% fanless) but slightly more expensive. If you can get a hold of the eBox-2.6 in your geographical location then I think thats pretty much the lowest cost thin client out there and works well with PXES (speaking from personal experience). Thanks, Ben Diego Torres Milano wrote: >I've installed PXES in some customers with Neoware clients (I don't >remember the exact model number). >Check also for VIA or National Semiconductor (AMD). >There's also a very low cost option (based on Vortex86) that I've used >to deploy some PXES solutions in Europe: >http://epatec.com/k001u001s001.htm > > > >On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 17:09, Anders Damm wrote: > > >>Hi all! >> >>I'm planing to deploy 300 thin clients in a RDP environment. As a old >>pxes-user, I like to run this with PXES and PXE-boot. >>We like to use simple and low-cost klients and are thinking about Neoware one. >>(there be some reuse of old pc also..) >> >>The quistion is: Have any one any experienc with Noeware one, or is there som >>better TS-hardware out there? >> >>Regard >>Anders D. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click