Re: Bandwidth utilisation per thin client

The answer is NX/freeNX.

---- Original message ----
>Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 13:39:24 +1000
>From: Tim Bates <[email protected]>  
>Subject: Re: [pxes-devel] Bandwidth utilisation per thin client  
>To: [email protected]
>
>Ben wrote:
>
>> No. XDM is very heavy, you would be lucky to get one
responsive XDM 
>> session over a 1M link.
>>
>>  
>>
>I agree. When I was teaching some people how to do network
booting and 
>thin client stuff, we were using 2 clients on a 10mbps hub
based network 
>(so 3 boxes total), and performance was usable but not good.
>I have tried 13 clients on a 100mbps network, and it was
actually not 
>too bad. Slowness with that was mostly the major lack of RAM
in our 
>server at the time.
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
>Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads,
discussions,
>and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
>_______________________________________________
>pxes-devel mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pxes-devel
Diego Torres Milano <[email protected]>
PXES Universal Linux Thin Client


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl